<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Funcoder Technology Blog &#187; css</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.funcoder.com/tag/css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.funcoder.com</link>
	<description>A UK Based Developer, Living and Breathing Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WebDEV &#8211; Old Style HTML Code</title>
		<link>http://www.funcoder.com/webdev-old-style-html-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.funcoder.com/webdev-old-style-html-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WebDev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Soft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funcoder.com/2009/04/07/webdev-old-style-html-code/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably noticed from the posts on my blog I am creating more websites lately for clients. I wanted to make this post to make a point about one issue I have with the HTML code that WebDEV creates. As a test I created a simple page in WebDEV and Dreamweaver 8. Here’s the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you probably noticed from the posts on my blog I am creating more websites lately for clients.</p>
<p>I wanted to make this post to make a point about one issue I have with the HTML code that <a href="http://www.windev.com" target="_blank">WebDEV</a> creates.</p>
<p>As a test I created a simple page in WebDEV and Dreamweaver 8. Here’s the page I built:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.funcoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/image.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.funcoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/image-thumb.png" width="444" height="465" /></a> </p>
<p>Now the old style way to build a page is using TABLE elements, but that’s just not done now. It causes all sorts of complications with compatibility with browsers, even though WebDEV has some compatibility functionality.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.funcoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/image1.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.funcoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/image-thumb1.png" width="472" height="348" /></a> </p>
<p>As you can see in the above source code generated, WebDEV builds the layout around tables which is really horrid.</p>
<p>I would love to see WebDEV take a leaf out of the Dreamweaver book. I created the same design in Dreamweaver 8:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.funcoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/image2.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.funcoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/image-thumb2.png" width="472" height="124" /></a> </p>
<p>As you can see the code that Dreamweaver produces is so much cleaner and will also load faster as it is using CSS to layout the page. This is the code I want to see WebDEV produce, clean, quick and modern.</p>
<p>What do you think? What are your views on this?</p>
<p>Please leave a comment with your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.funcoder.com/webdev-old-style-html-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
